Emotional pain may not be attributed to a person's sinful actions is a statement supported by Tan. Which option reflects this idea?

• A. All emotional pain is attributed to sin
• B. Emotional pain may not be attributed to a person's sinful actions
• C. The dark night of the soul is not spiritual
• D. Emotions have no place in theology

Answer: (B)

The main idea being tested is that emotional pain isn’t automatically tied to personal sin. Tan’s view acknowledges that people can suffer for reasons beyond moral wrongdoing, and that emotional distress can arise from life circumstances, trauma, or existential struggle without blaming the person for sin.

So the option that reflects this idea is the one that states emotional pain may not be attributed to a person’s sinful actions. It captures the notion of compassionate understanding: distress can be real and meaningful without implying guilt or punishment for sin.

The other statements don’t fit because they either insist that all emotional pain comes from sin, deny the spiritual dimension of experiences like the dark night of the soul, or dismiss the role of emotions within theology. Each of those contradicts the nuanced stance that pain can exist independently of sin and still have important theological and pastoral significance.